Posts mit dem Label equalizer werden angezeigt. Alle Posts anzeigen
Posts mit dem Label equalizer werden angezeigt. Alle Posts anzeigen

Mittwoch, 11. September 2019

Coasta Cordalis, restoration of analog master tapes and and single vinyls



.

An employee of Bellaphon Records has dived into the archive to retrieve old audios of Costa Cordalis and daylight. He came with the 1/4 "masterband of his first album "Folkolore Aus Aller Welt" from 1966 and some vinyl singles.
This material now had to be digitized and, if necessary, worked up.
To my astonishment was the sound that came from the 1/4 "band very well, the sound was stereo and there was almost no noise to hear. The entire album was only produced with two acoustic guitars and a lead vocal. With the pegeltone I fixed the azimuth of the machine heads. Then I set the recording level so that the loudest passages were about -10 to -6dB. In total, there should be 13 tracks on the album. To my surprise, there was a bonus track, which was refereed and additional announcements to the individual titles in the appropriate languages ​​of the songs. These takes were played at the end of the tape. I bounced them together after the digitization to the individual songs. In a particular title, the noise in Intro was a bit strong, so at the request of Bellaphon, I ran away from the section in question. For this job I have several tools of iZotope (RX7) and Steinberg available. 
De-noiseing is generally about reducing noise without affecting the sound of the music. My plug-in is available with the Voxengo Gliss Equalizer in combination with a dynamic equalizer. Both components have intervened very little in the program. Adding both tools quickly stopped the noise without affecting the amount of music.

Much more complex was the challenge of optimizing the sound of old single-vinyl records.
 Here was a whole range of imperfections to work on. The sound was mono, contained plenty of disk crackers and sometimes quite unsightly distortions. First of all, I played the vinyls (dry) as they were. When digitizing it was only about the plates properly in an appropriate level to play in the calculator. Again, I kept the level at -10 dB to -6dB. Also for eliminating the cracker software from Wavelab and IZotope is available. Here the RX 7 worked very well. The cracker I could eliminate it. However, it was necessary to individually identify and mark each cracker and calculate or render with the correct threshhold. If I chose the section too long, because two crackers were relatively close to each other, then the tool "killed" the punch of the snare drum because it considered the transients of the drum to be a crackpot.The RX 7 was also able to eliminate distortion on some passages because it has kept the distortion over transients. This worked very well on some passages, in other places a more specific solution was needed. 

I experimented with a multiband compressor in combination with a de-esser. Distortion in most cases affected the voice in the frequency range between 2000 Hz and 4000 Hz. With the compressor, I reduced the critical frequency range by about 2-3 dB. It turned out, however, that this reduction was not enough on the one hand, but on the other hand, with a greater reduction, the voice became noticeably too quiet. Therefore, I did additionally with the de-esser very selectively reduced the tearing frequency. This narrowband processing allowed me a further reduction of 2 to 3 dB. Once again, I've found that a plug-in for a specific application does almost miracles, but does not provide a usable result for another problems. In any case, it is necessary to deal with the matter exactly. Simple "plug and play" tends to destroy the program rather than achieving a good result. I am amazed at what is now possible with modern software.


Stefan Noltemeyer

Montag, 3. August 2015

10 Tips for the perfect mix




  1. Even the mix is almost done in the process of producing a song, it makes sense to start the mixdown from the very beginning. Switch off all tracks, bypass all effects and inserts like, compressor and equalizer. Start with the bassdrum, adjust the level to appx -10 dBFS.
  1. continue with the snaredrum, the hi-hat, the bass follows ... (These are the instruments that generates the highest level.) Next are harmony instruments, keyboards and guitars. After that you can open the main voice to check if there are any sounds which covers the vocals.
  1. divide the mix in subgroups, one group for drums, one for keyboards, one for the voices, and so on ....You can edit the over all sound of the groups and you get better control of the total level.
  1. In the work of each single track, insert at first the equalizer following the compressor. For insert effects, like phaser, flanger, delays you can switch a second compressor after that.
  1. When filtering individual tracks, it may be possible, that the sound of an instrument it self does not sounds great, but in mixdown it works perfectly. So when setting a equalizer also listen to the connection of all instruments, not only solo.
  1. Acoustic instruments, voices, guitars, uses absolutely a compression. It limits the dynamic range. A ratio of 4:1 with a compression of 8-12 dB is useful for the voice. Watch the low frequencies compressing the bass (It easily gets lost); acoustic guitars tend slightly to pump by compression.
  1. Every instrument, every sound gets its assigned position. Imagine a three-dimensional coordinate system. There are left and right (panorama), up and down (treble and bass) and front and rear, determined by reverb and delay. The fourth dimension is the time. Each instrument gets his place. The automation allows changing the level of instruments in the flow of the song.
  1. Whenever multiple instruments sounds in the same or similar frequency range simultaneously, they mask each other. One classic example: the snaredrum and the voice (depending on the pitch), the louder the snare, the quieter sounds the voice.
  1. Effects are important. They are the salt in the soup, but each sound has its moment of performance. Delays can be programmed, on and off switched. Its easy to vary the send level of a reverb effect. Too much of a good thing brings too salty to enjoy.
  2. Never do the mix into an inserted limiter in the sum. He falsified the instrument balance. Maximizing or mastering is a separate session. It´s no problem to raise up a low leveled mixdown, but if its to high, you get in trouble (distortion). Never do mixdown and masring at once. It is useful to take a break of 24 hours until you do the mastering, or consult a specialist like...

Stefan Noltemeyer: www.mastering-online.com
E-Mail: info@mastering-online.com



Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007

Equlizer-Test

Equalizer test and comparison

After purchasing an Avalon AD 2055, I thought it would be useful to present my observations of this equalizer and the other equalizers that that we have at are disposal here at mastering-online.


Software EQ,

Emagic 7.2 : Channel EQ, Linear Phase EQ, Match EQ, Fat EQ, Silver EQ, DJ EQ,
UAD Plug Ins: Cambridge EQ, EX-1, Pultec EQ,
Izotope: Ozone 3

Digital Hardware:

EMT 248, Drawmer Masterflow, Tc Finalizser,

Analog Hardware:

Klein Hummel UE 1000, Tube Tech SMC2B, SPL PassEQ, Avalon AD 2055





In keeping with the demands of a modern state of the are mastering studio I purchased the Avalon AD 2055 and tested it against the digital Equalizers that are predominantly used by us here at the studio.

The Avalon has a passive shelf EQ filter for bass (18Hz-450Hz) and a high passive EQ filter (1.5KHz – 25KHz). These filters can be changed to parametric EQs which furthers the Avalon’s versatility. In addition there are two full parametric mid band EQs from 35hz to 450Hz and from 160Hz to 2 KHz, with variable frequency selection that can be switched to multiplications of ten. With this setup one can get to any necessary frequency, and again showing the flexibility of this Equalizer.

One point of the Avalon AD 2055, that I do not like, is there is no stereo link making it necessary to tweak left and right channels.

I like this equalizer not only for its fantastic filters. But also for its user friendly control knobs, that almost any Tec, would rather turn, then to be clicking and dragging around his or her mouse.


A question that I frequently get (and probably will continue getting) is “can I describe the sound of a particular equalizer?” Well, first and foremost the sound of an equalizer depends primarily on the music that is being worked on, and nothing more. The equalizer itself has no sound (unless I let it fall to the floor).

Now if I lift the highs with a wide band filter, I will be raising the highs that are present in this particular song, what I hear has to do with what is happening in the song, and not necessarily from the quality of the equalizer (unless it is an equalizer of very low quality, that may distort the signal and add hissing noise. Something that on the digital realm is as good as non existent).
Dwelling on the subject of “different sounding equalizers”. I found it necessary to do a comparison test. First I took a piece of music that sounded muffled. I then adjusted all of the equalizers, (Cambridge - Universal Audio Plug In, Pultec - Universal Audio Plug In, Izotope – Ozone 3, EMT 248, Channel EQ Emagic 7.2 Plug In, K&H UE 1000, SPL PassEQ, Avalon AD 2055) to the same setting , of a 6dB lift of 4KHz. And then matched all volume levels.

For monitors I used my Genelec 1031A with Subwoofer 1091A.

The Avalon stood up to and surpassed all of my expectations, and all of the digital Equalizers sounded weak in comparison. Of the digital Equalizers the Izotope faired best and the UAD’s Cambridge Eq sounded the worst.

To describe what I heard, I would say that with the digital filters I could hear that it was merely a mathematic computation, that lifted the highs at 4KHz but the sound remained muffled.

On the other hand the Avalon is different in that the music begins to live and my ears are exposed to what was once hidden, truly enriching the sound of the music.

The other two analog companions, had there difficulties competing with the Avalon. I had the feeling that the UE 1000s’ shelf filter is not steep enough, leaving the sound yet again muffled. The SPL has a similar problem, in that when raising the volume, phasing accurse, do to a R-C link.

So now I am looking to working daily, with my new main squeeze the Avalon AD 2055 (and no Avalon is not paying me for the plug)

All this is not to say, that before the Avalon we could not master a recording well. I have been using the EMT 248 for over 10 years with outstanding results. Imperative to making a good master is the technician doing the master.

If one is trying to realize a maximum technical achievement you must really stretch your self to the limit and that last 5% will be the toughest. Good equipment helps.

If you have any suggestions or questions please do not hesitate to write me at info@mastering-online.com


Technorati Tags: EQ, mastering, audio, Avalon
Technorati Profile

Posted from Stefan under 08:07 0 Kommentare

Labels: Audio, EQ, mastering

Abonnieren Posts (Atom)

Stefan Noltemeyer :  www.mastering-online.com
E-Mail: Info@mastering-online.com